Final phase · published 29 October 2026

Final standings

The Final phase has closed and every entry has been scored. Here are the standings for both challenges. The leading entries are now in internal review, and scores will be published once it is complete.

* Pending Competition Internal Review. Entries marked with an asterisk are the top seven of each challenge. They are listed in alphabetical order, not by place, while the organizers rebuild them from their reproduction packages and re-score them (see the Rules, Prize eligibility). Their final places and all scores will be published after the review.

Places from 8 onward are numbered. All places may still change after the review, for example if an entry above cannot be reproduced. Each team’s best scores across its Final submissions count, whether they arrived through Codabench, this website or email.

Award #1 · Challenge 1

Best DIII-D intra-machine reconstruction

Ranked by each team’s best DIII-D score across its Final submissions.

Top seven · in review

  • * beckhamc
  • * heavy4evy
  • * Lu Group - Siming Shan
  • * seantang
  • * syouya_tobita
  • * xiaoxiao5503
  • * yangyiliu

Places 8–58

  1. 8 dgaytanv
  2. 9 anulum fortis
  3. 10 dmitryzhevn
  4. 11 yanagi
  5. 12 pshishkin
  6. 13 huxiangyu
  7. 14 kim
  8. 15 collocator
  9. 16 alvar0
  10. 17 andregale
  11. 18 jcfeng
  12. 19 s_boehler
  13. 20 hbkwon
  14. 21 chaleong
  15. 22 hxynumone
  16. 23 hrahman
  17. 24 Vasily Gnuchev
  18. 25 menguiin
  19. 26 sekiro123
  20. 27 mohhakami
  21. 28 catskills
  22. 29 gaswang
  23. 30 glorenz
  24. 31 broker
  25. 32 mohawk
  26. 33 sudharshan
  27. 34 cliffsedge66
  28. 35 sarahman
  29. 36 stevekotlarz
  30. 37 xexpertai
  31. 38 pklein
  32. 39 ksalango
  33. 40 breakdown-voltage
  34. 41 pelloran
  35. 42 WennnHao
  36. 43 yue_ai4s
  37. 44 19algorythms
  38. 45 jygao
  39. 46 yszhang
  40. 47 unknowingsolver
  41. 48 brass-meridian-ops
  42. 49 matteopassero
  43. 50 jakmaddox
  44. 51 mxxll
  45. 52 hornedyak
  46. 53 nas_2242
  47. 54 tsujita
  48. 55 tariqj
  49. 56 dbarr
  50. 57 kevin9327
  51. 58 jaikamal
Award #2 · Challenge 2

Best DIII-D → MAST cross-machine generalization

Ranked by G_ratio, each team’s best MAST score divided by its best DIII-D score. Only entries whose best DIII-D score meets the eligibility threshold are ranked.

Top seven · in review

  • * beckhamc
  • * catskills
  • * dmitryzhevn
  • * hornedyak
  • * jygao
  • * nas_2242
  • * tsujita

Places 8–46

  1. 8 kim
  2. 9 yangyiliu
  3. 10 jakmaddox
  4. 11 hbkwon
  5. 12 sekiro123
  6. 13 matteopassero
  7. 14 andregale
  8. 15 menguiin
  9. 16 s_boehler
  10. 17 heavy4evy
  11. 18 xiaoxiao5503
  12. 19 syouya_tobita
  13. 20 seantang
  14. 21 stevekotlarz
  15. 22 yanagi
  16. 23 anulum fortis
  17. 24 huxiangyu
  18. 25 sudharshan
  19. 26 ksalango
  20. 27 collocator
  21. 28 yszhang
  22. 29 chaleong
  23. 30 hxynumone
  24. 31 alvar0
  25. 32 hrahman
  26. 33 gaswang
  27. 34 mxxll
  28. 35 unknowingsolver
  29. 36 broker
  30. 37 pklein
  31. 38 xexpertai
  32. 39 sarahman
  33. 40 19algorythms
  34. 41 brass-meridian-ops
  35. 42 pelloran
  36. 43 cliffsedge66
  37. 44 WennnHao
  38. 45 glorenz
  39. 46 mohawk
MAST blind fold

Honorable mentions

Each judged on the MAST blind fold, using each team’s submission with the best MAST score.

Top flux fidelity (R²ψ)

catskills *

Top predicted-scalar fidelity (R²_q95,βN)

dmitryzhevn *

Top flux-map consistency

dmitryzhevn *

Best LCFS alignment (D_LCFS)

catskills *

* Pending Competition Internal Review.